Frightening. Tragic. Inexcusable.
These words describe the escape of three dangerous convicts from a private prison near Kingman. The deaths of an Oklahoma couple, the sorrow of their family and the anxiety of countless others were the result of astonishing security lapses.
Here's another word: opportunity.
This is a chance for Arizona to look at the state's role and responsibility in punishing criminals.
It won't be easy. Questions about the future of corrections in Arizona require - dare we say it? - a rational examination. Not political. Not ideological. Rational.
Under Director Charles Ryan, the Arizona Department of Corrections has identified a host of security problems at the private prison from which killers escaped.
A report posted online shows a dizzying array of botched management. False alarms were so common that real ones were ignored. Prisoners went around without identification. Guards were inexperienced and not proficient with their weapons. The perimeter of the prison was so poorly controlled that an accomplice could throw wire cutters over the fence.
Management and Training Corp., which runs the prison, agreed to make changes. Ryan removed murderers from that prison and imposed new criteria for the kind of offenders sent there.
In addition, an administrative review is under way to see why the state's monitors did not provide adequate oversight. This will provide important information.
But there are more questions, and the answers will not come from the Department of Corrections.
As of July, about 19 percent of the state's prisoners were in private prisons, Ryan says. When 5,000 additional private-prison beds authorized by the Legislature are built, 22 percent to 24 percent of Arizona's prison beds will be private.
This is supposed to be a cost-effective option. Yet because the state maintains the highest-security prisoners and the sickest ones, it is difficult to make a direct cost comparison. After attempting to make the comparisons as fair as possible, it was found that it costs $3 to $8 more per day to house a medium-security inmate in a private prison, according to a DOC study released this year.
Factor in the safety concerns raised by the Kingman escape, and the costs go beyond dollars and cents.
This does not mean there is no role for private prisons in Arizona. But it does mean it is time to take a close look at the situation and ask some hard questions. We urge the governor to launch review by an unbiased and independent team. Arizona's universities would be a good place to look for experts on criminal justice and public policy who can present factual information and guide a reasoned discussion.
This is an opportunity to talk about the safest and most cost-effective way to handle prisoners.
Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/opinions/articles/2010/08/27/20100827fri1-27.html#ixzz0xrTdbQAk
geetarmanAug-26 @ 8:15 PM Report abuse 42.The cost effective way to handle those in or going to prison for the third time is a Winchester laxative.
ALL of them. In for the third time or going in for the third time? Please exit. Do not pass go and do not collect two hundred dollars. Smile and wait for the flash.
It will also have the benefit of being a powerful object lesson for those who either cannot or will not live in an ordered society.
.Your Reply to geetarman's Comment: Share this comment on Facebook
typhoonAug-27 @ 3:39 AM Report abuse 04.All prisoners convicted of Murder should be kept behing the walls of ASP Florence.
.Your Reply to typhoon's Comment: Share this comment on Facebook
View Profile
StNelsonAug-27 @ 6:25 AM Report abuse 23.Governor Brewer places an emphasis with other members (one for certain) of fearmongering claims of immigration, alleging that the beheadings are taking place along the border, and all immigrants are being used for drug trafficking. Really?
Does that include your gardener, handyman etc.?
But when the education budget was subtracted to danger levels, she managed to sign in a $100 million deal with private prisons that two of her staffers wer lobbying for (she didn't see anything unusual about this). You people accepted her as the GOP Candidate. Wow!
If I had manufactured such a deal, and witnessed what my mistake had created with the complete assasination of an Oklahoma couple as if it were a video game by a dangerous and meth addicted White Supremacist, could I have come to the campaign station smiling ear to ear after winning the GOP primary?
I would have carried that cross to my grave. Certainly I wouldn't have shamed myself into revelry when two innocent people wer murdered over my incompetent mistakes in Office.
There is 1 reply to this comment. Expand Collapse . niners74 Aug-27 @ 10:07 AM Report abuse02.It's all about the money. Makes you wonder how much in campaign contributions Brewer got from Management and Training doesn't it?
.Your Reply to niners74's Comment: Share this comment on Facebook
Your Reply to StNelson's Comment: Share this comment on Facebook
niners74Aug-27 @ 9:54 AM Report abuse 01.The parent company, Management and Training, sounds a lot like it is strickly money mangement and on-the-job training for prison employees...don't they have to attend some sort of trainging course that real correctional officers have to attend?
There is 1 reply to this comment. Expand Collapse . startle Aug-27 @ 1:04 PM Report abuse01.All the private prisons claim that they meet the same training standards as state employees. They don't. It costs money to train and retain good employees.
Private prisons are profit driven companies. Why wasn't the alarm working? Why do they have short term emplyees? Why didn't they have adequate staff to monitor the video equipment? Get the drift? It costs money to maintain alarms, retain experianced employees and have adequate staff on duty. Spending money to fix the problems would cut into the company profit.
.Your Reply to startle's Comment: Share this comment on Facebook
Your Reply to niners74's Comment: Share this comment on Facebook
View Profile
DELLETTAug-27 @ 12:50 PM Report abuse 01.==After attempting to make the comparisons as fair as possible, it was found that it costs $3 to $8 more per day to house a medium-security inmate in a private prison, according to a DOC study released this year.= =
Was that an impartial DOC study?
Private companies have the capability to be more efficient, but that certainly does not mean they will. Particularly if they have not been at it long. They are all about the bottom line and they have to be watched like a hawk. They are "attempting" to make a profit while charging less. It's possible. But not with companies that do not have a long term viability and proven results.
To privatize without scrupulous oversight is just another waste of taxpayer dollars.